Smriti Mandhana and Harmanpreet Kaur break down how protein fuels strength, recovery, and consistency in elite cricket, blending athlete insight with ChatGPT’s smart nutrition context. From strategic eating to smarter supplementation, the conversation reveals how peak performance today is built as much in kitchens and recovery routines as it is on the pitch.
In elite sport, greatness is often defined by what the world sees — the crowds, the scoreboards, the explosive cover drives and last-over heroics. But for athletes like Smriti Mandhana and Harmanpreet Kaur, the more revealing story unfolds in the quieter spaces, away from stadium lights and broadcast cameras. It lives in the routines that aren’t televised, the micro-decisions around food, rest and recovery, and the unglamorous discipline that enables them to do what most spectators assume comes naturally. This time, the two cricketers opened that door a little wider, breaking down a lesser-discussed yet foundational pillar of modern athletic performance: protein.
Anyone who has watched the evolution of Indian women’s cricket over the last decade has witnessed a visible shift in pace, power, and physicality. Smriti and Harman, two of the most recognisable faces of the team, are at the centre of that transformation. But beneath their public success lies a more technical story — one of nutritional reform that mirrors global high-performance sport, where protein is not just a dietary component but the raw material for consistency.
“It’s what allows you to do today what you did yesterday — and still do it again tomorrow,” Harmanpreet shared during the discussion. The line sounds almost philosophical, but for athletes playing tournaments that can stretch across continents and time zones, it is straightforward biology. Cricket may appear strategic and rhythmic, but for modern batters and fielders, it is also profoundly physical. Explosive bat speed, sharp running between the wickets, full-stretch dives in the outfield — these aren’t just skills; they are muscular actions powered by energy and rebuilt by protein.
Smriti, whose game blends timing with increasing strength, put it more simply. “People think training builds you, but really it breaks you. Protein is what puts you back together.” It’s a statement physiologists would nod at. Strength training causes micro-tears in muscle fibres, and recovery is essentially repair. Without sufficient protein intake, that cycle remains incomplete — strength stagnates, power drops, and even skills begin to degrade because the body doesn’t have adequate structural support.
What makes this conversation particularly current is how it reflects an emerging trend in Indian sport: athletes are no longer outsourcing their performance to talent alone. They’re turning inward, becoming students of their own bodies. ChatGPT’s presence in the conversation symbolises that shift — artificial intelligence entering a domain once driven by instinct and “experience,” adding a layer of data, knowledge and personalised context. Where earlier generations of athletes relied on traditional eating patterns or generic high-carb fueling, today’s professionals construct diets around amino acid profiles, absorption rates, and training windows.
Yet, neither Smriti nor Harman pretended that this transition was obvious or easy. Nutrition sits in the blind spot of Indian sporting culture. Our food philosophy historically prioritises satiety and tradition over performance logic. The idea that food can be strategic — that meals can be timed and dosed like training sessions — remains relatively new. “Earlier, we just ate whatever was cooked at home,” Smriti laughed. “Now, my plate looks like planning.”
Protein, in particular, carries cultural baggage. India is a predominantly carbohydrate nation; rice, rotis, dal, and vegetables dominate the plate. Protein-rich foods — poultry, seafood, eggs, whey, legumes in volume — are consumed inconsistently, especially among athletes who train twice a day. Harman highlighted this gap candidly. “We’re a vegetarian-heavy country. Even if you try your best, hitting daily protein targets is tough. That’s where smart choices and supplements help.”
Supplementation was a recurring theme in the discussion, not as a shortcut, but as a bridge — an increasingly accepted tool in high-performance circles to meet scientifically recommended intake levels. For an athlete weighing around 60 kilos, training five hours a day, the protein requirement can range between 100 to 120 grams daily. Reaching that through regular Indian meals alone demands mindful eating and careful structuring. Add tournaments, travel, and changing environments, and it becomes even more complex. Protein bars, shakes, and fortified snacks are no longer niche add-ons; they are infrastructure.
Although protein took centre stage, the conversation also peeled back the broader ecosystem of high performance. Sleep and micronutrients surfaced as co-stars. Good quality sleep triggers growth hormone release, which amplifies protein synthesis. Deficiencies in iron or vitamin D can sabotage recovery despite optimal training. Heat stress and travel fatigue can alter appetite cues, throwing nutrition off rhythm. Elite sport, in other words, is a symphony of small variables, and protein is only the most visible instrument.
Where AI entered the collaboration was in making the science less intimidating. Rather than presenting nutrition as clinical instruction, ChatGPT reframed it as a feedback mechanism — a way for athletes to ask better questions about cause and effect. What foods accelerate recovery? What protein types digest fastest post-training? How do vegetarian athletes strategise leucine intake? How does muscle mass influence endurance? These are no longer relegated to dieticians alone; athletes want to understand the “why” because it unlocks agency.
The exchange also highlighted a generational shift. The two cricketers belong to a cohort that treats performance not as fate but as architecture — built brick by brick. Gone are the days when talent alone could carry a professional sporting career. Smriti said it best: “You cannot hide from the work anymore. The game is too fast.” She didn’t mean cricket alone — she meant the global standards of strength, power, recovery metrics, and longevity. Protein had simply become the language through which this evolution could be explained.
Interestingly, consistency emerged as the true prize in the conversation. Peak performance is glamorous, but consistency is what separates a moment from a career. Protein plays a structural role here too: it reduces injury risk by strengthening connective tissue, it stabilises metabolic processes over long seasons, and it protects lean muscle mass during fatigue cycles. Without it, form fluctuates; with it, floors rise — the base performance level below which an athlete rarely falls. That, more than any headline-grabbing innings, defines modern greatness.
If one needed proof, it exists in cricket’s calendar. Years are longer, formats overlap, domestic leagues add pressure, and women’s cricket now carries commercial and international expectations once reserved for the men’s circuit. That workload cannot be survived, let alone excelled in, without an intelligent relationship with food. Protein has therefore transitioned from optional to operational — a core resource like hydration, equipment, or physiotherapy.
Toward the end of the discussion, Harman summed up the ethos with characteristic bluntness: “If your body goes, nothing else matters.” It’s a line that collapses cricket, fitness, and nutrition into a single truth. And it serves as a reminder that while fans obsess over technique, matchups, and selection debates, the real work is happening in kitchens, gyms, recovery rooms, and — increasingly — in the unseen spaces where athletes ask better questions and get smarter answers.
The collaboration between the two players and ChatGPT is symbolic of where sport is headed: a world where expertise is not siloed. Athletes are no longer just training harder; they are training smarter, eating with purpose, thinking like physiologists, and leveraging tools once foreign to the locker room. It proves something profound: champions aren’t merely made on the pitch. They are assembled — molecule by molecule — long before the cameras arrive.
Discover more from Creative Brands
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
